I was assisting a process owner on improving his function’s process flow. His section together with the rest in the organization is in most cases faced with “unexpected” urgent matters that need to be done soon. BUT these unfortunately are not in his scope of work. Let us admit that such scenarios happen in operations, and in a “quality managed system” the best defense for this is risk based thinking”.
Nevertheless, for those still on the journey to quality management system, a recommended approach on this, is prioritizing by choosing your big rocks? The usual reply, of course is – all of them are big rocks!!
How do we define big rocks? Are these that require immediate action as mandated by “management”? OR are these the obstructions to completing my tasks?
A risk-thinking approach is to use priority matrix. Yes, it does help, but even before using this, it is essential to clarify your definition of “big rock”. A wise approach is to ask oneself why am I in this position?
However, a more realistic approach to know what your “big rock “is not what you need to complete first . BUT the one that IS DEEP-SEATED TO YOUR JOB ROLE AND YOUR KEY PERFORMANCE OUTPUT. Why do you think? Because they are essentially linked to the organization’s STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES. Look for your “big rock” that will block and stall the course of your own performance marker
but also those of other cross-functional key indicators; causing breakdown to the mother goals.
“How can I put these all together when my Boss is always at my back on results of the “unexpected urgent” projects (UUP)?”
At the start of the year create your “master plan” – here are the recommended steps –
– Identify and List the activities of your key results areas with corresponding KPIS
– Prioritize: define the Big Rock/s
– Plan your activities with milestones; resources, timeline
– Incorporate the “what ifs” (risk-based thinking)
– Blend the solutions into the plan
– Execute
– Monitor
When a UUP occurs, it will not be tough to pinpoint where in your Plan the modification reside with less impact to the original one.
– At year end – Review your “master plan” and assess yourself on how it was executed.
– Identify what can be improved and set as a standard that worked well.
This is a cycle with a word of caution to consider the business and organizational changes for the next cycle. Adapt changes when needed.